Currently looking at adding a ceres gravity model using dawn data found here: (DWNCGRS_2_v4_20240517) Looking at the lbl for the coefficients ``` Some details describing this model are: The spherical harmonic coefficients are fully normalized. The associated GM = 62.6290536121 km^3/s^2 The reference radius = 470.0 km The Ceres-fixed reference frame prime meridian and pole location in IAU coordinates is given by Right ascension = 291.42763 degrees (estimated) RA rate = 0.0 degrees/cty (fixed) Declination = 66.76033 degrees (estimated) Dec rate = 0.0 degrees/cty (fixed) Prime Meridian = 170.309 degrees (estimated) Rotation rate = 952.1532635 degrees/day (estimated) The pole location, W0 and spin rate are estimated jointly with the gravity field by fixing the y-value of the Kait landmark to zero. The uncertainties of the pole for this solution are Right ascension = 0.0002 degrees Declination = 0.0002 degrees Note ceres18d is similar to ceres18c version 2 of the gravity field which has the corrected location of the kait crater. This is a rotation of -0.064074 deg about the z-axis versus the previous version of the gravity field. ``` I'm particularly worried about `Prime Meridian = 170.309 degrees (estimated)` value, what should the prime meridian for the model be to match with KSP? Is there any way to ensure the gravity model matches with the actual terrain data?