paste1
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+Currently looking at adding a ceres gravity model using dawn data found here: <https://sbnarchive.psi.edu/pds3/dawn/grav/> (DWNCGRS_2_v4_20240517)
+
+Looking at the lbl for the coefficients
+```
+Some details describing this model are:
+ The spherical harmonic coefficients are fully normalized.
+ The associated GM = 62.6290536121 km^3/s^2
+ The reference radius = 470.0 km
+ The Ceres-fixed reference frame prime meridian and pole
+ location in IAU coordinates is given by
+ Right ascension = 291.42763 degrees (estimated)
+ RA rate = 0.0 degrees/cty (fixed)
+ Declination = 66.76033 degrees (estimated)
+ Dec rate = 0.0 degrees/cty (fixed)
+ Prime Meridian = 170.309 degrees (estimated)
+ Rotation rate = 952.1532635 degrees/day (estimated)
+ The pole location, W0 and spin rate are estimated jointly with the
+ gravity field by fixing the y-value of the Kait landmark to zero.
+ The uncertainties of the pole for this solution are
+ Right ascension = 0.0002 degrees
+ Declination = 0.0002 degrees
+ Note ceres18d is similar to ceres18c version 2 of the gravity field
+ which has the corrected location of the kait crater. This is a
+ rotation of -0.064074 deg about the z-axis versus the previous
+ version of the gravity field.
+```
+
+I'm particularly worried about `Prime Meridian = 170.309 degrees (estimated)` value, what should the prime meridian for the model be to match with KSP? Is there any way to ensure the gravity model matches with the actual terrain data?